Not even 6 months have passed since the eeePC has been available for sale and you might say that its too soon to call it "the iPod of" anything. But I beg to disagree. As every other eeePC owner knows, once you share your "happiness" experience with another, they're highly likely to run right out and buy one for themselves.
How many other products out there in the market can boast of that rate of instant word of mouth success?
Also as every eeePC owner knows, people will ooh and aah over it once you pull it out of your bag, asking you what on earth is it, how much was it and where can they buy one too. Even the security guard at Cape Town airport laughed when I sent it through the X Ray machines as a laptop, telling me it was just a larger mobile. As in cellphone. Interestingly enough, ASUS themselves insist its not a notebook.
So why is it new "the iPod"?
Discussions online seem to focus on two aspects of the eeePC when analysing its runaway success - the form factor and the price. Imho, it was only when reading this article on the Foleo and its early demise that it struck me that what makes the eeePC so special is its positioning. Lets step back a moment and look at what's being said before getting into details about the eeePC's positioning and how that's going to drive its success.
Sony's recent comments on the eeePC's perceived threat are revealing - they see it as the beginning of a downward spiral in prices if ASUS takes off with the mainstream audience and not just geeks, Linux lovers and early adopters as it has already done so. Developed world articles have also begun referring to it as a children's computer. Its not just that of course but it helps keeps the fears of other PC makers at bay - HP plans to launch an "eeePC killer", while Acer is readying one for launch, etc etc etc.
Imho, this is where the big manufacturers are getting it all wrong, or who knows, the analysts and reporters covering this recent brouhaha. Here's a snippet that shed light on this for me,
But that kind of pricing also could represent a good opportunity for the HPs and Acers of the world. This type of subnotebook is aimed at a very narrow group of users, and that's not necessarily a bad thing, according to Stephen Baker, vice president of industry analysis for The NPD Group.
The pricing shows "it's not focused on being people's primary computer," he said. "Like the MacBook Air, like the Eee, like the Foleo was going to be. We tend to think of them in the context of other notebooks or portable devices, but they're really not designed to be a primary portable device. It's designed to be a niche product that focuses on a very specific usage model."
Wrong! Here is where positioning comes into play. The eeePC was never meant to be a Foleo or a MacBook Air, it wasn't even meant for the audience its taken by storm. The United States just happened to be the first place where ASUS launched it, not that its an emerging market of any sort, but that's just a strategic move by them to see how many ripples can this pebble create in a stagnant industry.
The eeePC was positioned for lower income segments in developing nations, the "next billion" customers in emerging markets and so was designed for their needs. This it does very very well. It meets the design specifications required for this audience and it just so happens, because it was designed so well and so clearly positioned, it has also caught the eye of anyone and everyone who appreciates just what they've managed to do so effectively. How?
Design - 5 stars
The eeePC was designed
to be an affordable, durable, rugged, lightweight mobile information
device that would appeal to first time users of personal computers in
emerging markets. It not only meets the specifications laid out in its
design brief very effectively but also catches the attention of
bystanders and onlookers. Its cute and cool and fun to carry and use.
It survived the "torture test". It meets the design expectations of customers at the bottom of the pyramid. And its cheaper than most smartphones or high end mobiles.
Relevance and Access - 5 stars
This product is aimed at first time users - "the next billion customers" - the majority of whom may only have been introduced to any kind of high tech computing device via their experience with their mobile phone. We can safely assume this, there are umpteen billion mobile phones being used in the world right now, 60% of them in developing nations. From this context, the user interface that ASUS presents as "easy to use" feels familiar to them, if only that the majority of cellphones now use some kind of icon based navigation and demonstrate a similar look and feel. Compare that to the intimidation of facing a totally unfamiliar desktop environment. Even the charger that comes with the eeePC resembles that of a mobile phone.
Access has also been designed to take into the account the infrastructural conditions in emerging markets - its not simply dependent on wifi or ethernet or some such thing that may not be available at all in parts of Africa say, the wizard lets you connect via a 3G modem or whathave you - after some initial delay in setting it up, my eeePC connected to the great online in the sky from anywhere in rural South Africa as long as there was a cellphone signal.
The ecosystem - 5 stars
The eeePC takes full advantage of what's available out there in the 'free' world in order to supply the basics what one really needs today from one's personal computing device. Look at the photograph above - write someone a letter, chat with them via text messaging, call them on the phone, listen to the radio, get the time, use an enclyopaedia or dictionary - its all out there for free, all you need is a SIM card with some money on it for airtime, which I as discovered, lasted longer as "data" than it did for "voice". The same goes for a whole host of other basic needs from basic word processing to simple office functions as well media management of music, games and photos. Again, I could go on and on, but the point here isn't to enumerate what the eeePC can do so much as how it manages to do it.
These factors are what made the iPod what it is today, it wasn't the first MP3 player, but hit the right buttons with its combination of product design, usability, the iTunes ecosystem et al to become the "wonder" that it did, influencing change that was far reaching and putting Apple back on the global map. The eeePC is doing the same for ASUS. After all, it wasn't the first of its kind, the OLPC was, but it was certainly the first one available easily and cheaply to anyone who wanted it. Its a good thing they didn't listen to the analysts.
There's a post in here somewhere about market forces doing better, faster and cheaper than any non profit if there's a fortune to be made, but that's for another day.
Positioning and strategy
This is why the Foleo was panned - the product was not dissimilar to the eeePC but aimed at too narrow a niche amongst a jaded audience saturated with broadband and computing choices. Its position and relevance wasn't clearly defined. Its intended audience didn't "need" it. And the MacBook Air which is reliant solely on wifi and priced ridiculously gets the reviews it does.
But ASUS, on the other hand, clearly framed the design challenge - meeting an unmet need, that of affordable computing for emerging markets, not a niche market by any count - so the design team was able to come with a better solution at the right price point effectively. And human beings aren't all that different so the eeePC managed to hit a few buttons everywhere else as well. This clarity of the design strategy is what allowed it to get all the details right, it wasn't simply aiming at "cheap and small". Those are features that support the goal, not the goal itself.
Its a brilliant piece of marketing strategy to begin launching a product aimed at the newbie in what is probably the most sophisticated computer market in the world. Why? Because what is the one thing geeks and hackers and lovers of gadgets, those early adopters, will do once they get their hands on one of these babies? Blog about them, talk about them, create forums and boards for them, write patches and apps for it etc etc etc. By the time the eeePC gets out to the people for whom its really meant for, all the bugs and kinks would have been worked out for the most part, help and information will be available online. One hopes,that it will soon begin to be available where its needed the most - at the bottom of the pyramid.
As James U of Unlimited Potential says in his blog,
But I also know the reality of the physics of the IT industry and the difficulty in trying to go from zero to millions of deployed, functioning, supported machines in a matter of months. About the nature of how this industry works, where one group may come up with an idea and then other organizations or individuals build on the idea and come in from seemingly nowhere (hello ASUS!) with a different type of solution to fill a vacuum created by the original vision.[...]
But that's all OK, because the OLPC vision isn't going to go away. There will be a permanent role for low cost, flash-based PCs in national education and technology policies. The XO will survive and evolve, and I bet every laptop vendor on the planet including Dell and HP will have a competing machine within 24 months. A new ecosystem of collaborative, social network-inspired and Internet-enabled education software will emerge. Cell phones will play a bigger role in this space than even Nicholas is publicly acknowledging. And kids and teachers will author a lot of the content.
Dangerous dreamers who assume they will change the world in two years but actually do so in ten, in a manner they never initially anticipated.
And that's going to be the real power of the eeePC's sustainable success - its already prepared for the next billion customers that it aims to reach, that's the power of its positioning and the value of its design, and its going leave the HP's, Sony's, Acer's et al behind if they imagine that its success is only due to form factor and price as they develop their competing machines.

eeePC! I think I will try it out...lets see if it is really as good as the hype that surrounds it....
Posted by: aravind | March 11, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Mobile phones were never designed for text messaging.
Can the eeePC be turned into a combo device (ie. add mobile phone functionality) to it such that it can do SMS as well as take incoming calls?
Posted by: Tango | March 23, 2008 at 04:50 AM
Wow! Talk about enthusiasm! ;-) Did it waver at all, in the past two months?
In Austin, TX, the eeePC was quite visible in early March, what with SXSWi and BarCamp. It did look like a convenient machine for geeks and it's easy to compare it to the OLPC XO.
I like the cellphone angle. It's easy to get the impression that cellphones are the "killer app," in many parts of the world. And there's no reason computer manufacturers can't use the market penetration as a jumping board to deploy non-phone computers.
Partly positioning but also timing. Sounds like the eeePC was the right machine at the right time.
I still think there's room for another device category more similar to handhelds than to subnotebooks. Something between a cellphone, a portable game, a personal media player, and a personal digital assistant. It could serve as the inspiration for a follow-up to the OLPC project.
Apart from corporate, marketing, and cost issues, the iPhone is close to being it. Google's Open Handset Alliance may produce something even more appropriate. And better adapted to the cultural, climatic, and economic conditions of those people who don't have easy access to the kind of computers "we" take for granted.
Describing the prototypical device in this category.
The OS and GUI, which seem like major advantages of the eeePC, could certainly be of the mobile/handheld type. There are so many commonalities between Symbian, NewtonOS, Android, PalmOS, Cocoa Touch, Mobile Linux, PlaystationPortable, WindowsCE, and Nintendo DS that it doesn't seem very logical to contruct a completely new GUI/OS "paradigm," like Sugar was apparently trying to do.
The device requires some form of wireless connectivity (for data). Doesn't need to be extremely fast, but it should be flexible and it absolutely cannot be cost-prohibitive. XO-style mesh networking could be a very interesting option. Voice can easily be transmitted as data.
My sense is that a multitouch interface with an accelerometer would be extremely effective. Yes, I'm thinking of Apple's Touch devices and MacBooks. One thing they've shown is how "intuitive" it can be to interact with a machine using gestures.
I'm still not sure a keyboard is that important. Even those people who are very literate don't tend to be extremely good typists. A cellphone keypad can be quite effective in some hands and there are several other ways to input text (like MessagEase), especially if typing isn't too ingrained in you. After all, keyboards aren't that convenient in multilingual contexts (i.e., in most parts of the world).
A voice interface would be fabulous, but there still seem to be technical issues with both speech recognition and speech synthesis. I used to work in that field and I keep dreaming, like Bill Gates and other, that it will finally take the world by storm. But maybe the time still hasn't come.
If the device is to be used for voice communication, some audio support is absolutely required. Even if voice communication isn't part of it, audio is very useful, IMHO (I'm an aural guy). In some parts of the world, speakers are much favoured to headphones/headsets. But I personally wish the device would have external audio inputs/outputs. Maybe through USB or an iPod-style connector.
It's hard to tell what size the screen should be. But Apple's Touch devices proved that you don't need a very large screen to have an immersive experience. Maybe it should be larger than an iPhone or iPod touch. Maybe the eeePC had it right. Especially if the device's form factor is more like a big handheld than like a small subnotebook (i.e., slimmer than an eeePC). One reason form factor matters, in my mind, is that it could make the device "disappear." That, and the difference between having a device in your pocket and carrying a bag with a device in it. Form factor was a big issue with my Newton MessagePad 130. As the OLPC XO showed, cost and power consumption are also important issues regarding screen size.
Though a camera seems to be a given in any portable device (even the OLPC XO has one), I'm not that clear on how important it really is. Maybe as an option.
GPS could have interesting uses, but doesn't seem very cost-effective. Other "wireless positioning systems" (à la Skyhook) might be a more rational option.
Bluetooth seems like luxury. Sure, it can be neat. But I don't feel it adds that much functionality to the device.
Yes, I do realize I pretty much described an iPod touch (or an iPhone without camera, Bluetooth, or cellphone fees). I've been lusting over an iPod touch since September and it does colour my approach. I sincerely think the iPod touch could serve as an inspiration for a new device type.
Posted by: Alexandre | May 20, 2008 at 01:34 AM
Yeah it could become something big, if the damn thing connected easily to WIFI. Read up and a whole slew of owners including myself get this bizzare "cannot get DHCP" lease from practically 80% of wifi locations out there.
I don't know what Hatian voodoo magic ASUS decided to use, but it was cheap..something is rotten and I'm guessing it was the great P.C. snow job on parts and software. Someone cut corners somewhere on the most important part of the damn unit.
Trying a few more things, then back in the box and think I'll leave some hork in as a cherry on top...
Posted by: Robert Foerster | May 22, 2008 at 11:51 PM
UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE:
Okie dokey...works fine at home, next test is on wifi's out and about the city.
It even went out of it's way to help me connect at home, suggesting I do so before I even touched networks function.
It's likely a few things have to be just right, but as I commented to another poster here...it's the 'little manic depressive computer that could'. High maintenance regarding wifi, but if you throw some wine down it's throat..(mostly my whining) it seems to work.
I found NOT using shared key helps...actually i had trouble with shared key and my regular notebook.
Cheers
Posted by: Robert Foerster | May 23, 2008 at 03:51 PM