« Comments to my RSS community | Main | A thought experiment in design »

March 05, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4e6c53ef00e55098161d8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The little eeePC that could has become the real "iPod" of personal computing:

Comments

eeePC! I think I will try it out...lets see if it is really as good as the hype that surrounds it....

Mobile phones were never designed for text messaging.
Can the eeePC be turned into a combo device (ie. add mobile phone functionality) to it such that it can do SMS as well as take incoming calls?

Wow! Talk about enthusiasm! ;-) Did it waver at all, in the past two months?
In Austin, TX, the eeePC was quite visible in early March, what with SXSWi and BarCamp. It did look like a convenient machine for geeks and it's easy to compare it to the OLPC XO.
I like the cellphone angle. It's easy to get the impression that cellphones are the "killer app," in many parts of the world. And there's no reason computer manufacturers can't use the market penetration as a jumping board to deploy non-phone computers.
Partly positioning but also timing. Sounds like the eeePC was the right machine at the right time.
I still think there's room for another device category more similar to handhelds than to subnotebooks. Something between a cellphone, a portable game, a personal media player, and a personal digital assistant. It could serve as the inspiration for a follow-up to the OLPC project.
Apart from corporate, marketing, and cost issues, the iPhone is close to being it. Google's Open Handset Alliance may produce something even more appropriate. And better adapted to the cultural, climatic, and economic conditions of those people who don't have easy access to the kind of computers "we" take for granted.
Describing the prototypical device in this category.
The OS and GUI, which seem like major advantages of the eeePC, could certainly be of the mobile/handheld type. There are so many commonalities between Symbian, NewtonOS, Android, PalmOS, Cocoa Touch, Mobile Linux, PlaystationPortable, WindowsCE, and Nintendo DS that it doesn't seem very logical to contruct a completely new GUI/OS "paradigm," like Sugar was apparently trying to do.
The device requires some form of wireless connectivity (for data). Doesn't need to be extremely fast, but it should be flexible and it absolutely cannot be cost-prohibitive. XO-style mesh networking could be a very interesting option. Voice can easily be transmitted as data.
My sense is that a multitouch interface with an accelerometer would be extremely effective. Yes, I'm thinking of Apple's Touch devices and MacBooks. One thing they've shown is how "intuitive" it can be to interact with a machine using gestures.
I'm still not sure a keyboard is that important. Even those people who are very literate don't tend to be extremely good typists. A cellphone keypad can be quite effective in some hands and there are several other ways to input text (like MessagEase), especially if typing isn't too ingrained in you. After all, keyboards aren't that convenient in multilingual contexts (i.e., in most parts of the world).
A voice interface would be fabulous, but there still seem to be technical issues with both speech recognition and speech synthesis. I used to work in that field and I keep dreaming, like Bill Gates and other, that it will finally take the world by storm. But maybe the time still hasn't come.
If the device is to be used for voice communication, some audio support is absolutely required. Even if voice communication isn't part of it, audio is very useful, IMHO (I'm an aural guy). In some parts of the world, speakers are much favoured to headphones/headsets. But I personally wish the device would have external audio inputs/outputs. Maybe through USB or an iPod-style connector.
It's hard to tell what size the screen should be. But Apple's Touch devices proved that you don't need a very large screen to have an immersive experience. Maybe it should be larger than an iPhone or iPod touch. Maybe the eeePC had it right. Especially if the device's form factor is more like a big handheld than like a small subnotebook (i.e., slimmer than an eeePC). One reason form factor matters, in my mind, is that it could make the device "disappear." That, and the difference between having a device in your pocket and carrying a bag with a device in it. Form factor was a big issue with my Newton MessagePad 130. As the OLPC XO showed, cost and power consumption are also important issues regarding screen size.
Though a camera seems to be a given in any portable device (even the OLPC XO has one), I'm not that clear on how important it really is. Maybe as an option.
GPS could have interesting uses, but doesn't seem very cost-effective. Other "wireless positioning systems" (à la Skyhook) might be a more rational option.
Bluetooth seems like luxury. Sure, it can be neat. But I don't feel it adds that much functionality to the device.

Yes, I do realize I pretty much described an iPod touch (or an iPhone without camera, Bluetooth, or cellphone fees). I've been lusting over an iPod touch since September and it does colour my approach. I sincerely think the iPod touch could serve as an inspiration for a new device type.

Yeah it could become something big, if the damn thing connected easily to WIFI. Read up and a whole slew of owners including myself get this bizzare "cannot get DHCP" lease from practically 80% of wifi locations out there.

I don't know what Hatian voodoo magic ASUS decided to use, but it was cheap..something is rotten and I'm guessing it was the great P.C. snow job on parts and software. Someone cut corners somewhere on the most important part of the damn unit.

Trying a few more things, then back in the box and think I'll leave some hork in as a cherry on top...

UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE:

Okie dokey...works fine at home, next test is on wifi's out and about the city.

It even went out of it's way to help me connect at home, suggesting I do so before I even touched networks function.

It's likely a few things have to be just right, but as I commented to another poster here...it's the 'little manic depressive computer that could'. High maintenance regarding wifi, but if you throw some wine down it's throat..(mostly my whining) it seems to work.

I found NOT using shared key helps...actually i had trouble with shared key and my regular notebook.

Cheers

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Introduction

  • A combination of global trendspotting, strategic insight and informed intuition leading to concise yet clear articulation of opportunity spaces for new revenue generation and growth via new products, services or businesses. Particular interest area: new and emerging markets of BRIC and BoP; innovative business models for the bottom of the pyramid. Emerging global market trends.

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Copyright

  • Please do not copy and paste entire articles in other forums and emails. A short selection and link is more appropriate. If you would like for others to read the blog, please link back to my blog. If you use a sentence or quote in my blog, please attribute the work to me.
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 04/2005

Random




  • eXTReMe Tracker